The Secret Law and You




Note: Please visit this web site for more info, vids, templates etc.






Chapter 1. The Secret Law and you.



For years I have wondered why so many people are walking around with there heads firmly stuck in the sand, while a large growing few manage to live life to the full.

This collection of information has been painstakingly put together over a number of years; I have collected freely available information from various sources.

The information will be hard to swallow and quite unbelievable, that's ok, because when I first started getting interested in this type of material I was the same.

Now with so much spinning around in my head, now is the time to put as much as possible onto paper and share this amazing information.

I wanted to start this collection with some thing we all face each day or hear about on the TV.

We all receive bills through the post, and some time we receive court orders for our naughty non payments of council tax or TV licence ETC.

So what I am going to tell you will open your eyes to the secret world of the law.

Before I start please after reading this and being in shock test it out and hear the truth.

Phone up your bank and ask to speak to the manager not the phone operator as they are not informed of the banking law.

If you are lucky and the manager is on the ball he or she may be able to tell you what I am saying is the truth, the banking law is The Maritime Admiralty Law "TMAL".

For 1600 years banking has been with us from the Romans right up to the present day run by corporations, it has been run the same way and has the same rules.

What people don't realise is that the banks & the law is a global one, this planet has a world law which each and every one of us adheres to, with or mainly with out your knowledge.

We are all controlled by the banks and they control the law.

People in the know will always keep there secrets and will not tell you anything, even when you have to appear at court.

There will be one person who will know and that’s the judge.

Your basic lawyers/barristers will not know the true global law and are only there to support you.

There are two laws, one is civil law meaning civilian law, the law of the land, the law of the people, and each country has its own individual civil law. The second is contract law, corporate law for corporations.

But what you don't know that there is a law which overseas all of these and is the ruling law. This law is called The Maritime Admiralty Law, aka British Maritime Admiralty Law, also known as the law of the sea.

This law has been in existence since laws were created and affects each and every one of us.

Now this part gets very interesting and mind changing so get ready.

Did you know that you don't own your own body and according to 'TMAL' you are dead? You are the property of a secret corporation as each and every one of us is.

You are a subject to the Queen.

Have you ever noticed how your name appears on any bill when it arrives in the post , you will find your name spelt in capital letters, you would say yes that’s my name, but believe me its not your name and its not you.

The name written is a corporate name under 'TMAL' if you were to receive a bill with your name in upper and lower case letters, under 'TAML' this is you, this is the body,blood,soul identity you. Have a look now on any credit card or household bill and you will see what I am writing about.

Still when you visit a church have a look at all the grave stones and you will find that all the names are in capital letters, they have to be written that way under law as they are dead living and deceased under The Maritime Admiralty law.

Well so far so good, before I go any further, because what you are about to read will change you life forever, I am going to explain why you are the property of a corporation.

Our world is controlled by very intelligent people who live by secret words and simbles, when you enter into there world you don't even know that you have suddenly been caught in there web.

For example this will put the cat amongst the pigeons, if you have to go to court for any thing, and remember a court is where a game is played and the judge is the referee.

When you open the gate and enter the dock, dock being another maritime word, you leave behind you the law of the land, the land of the civilians; you suddenly come under the law of the sea.

Just by touching the gate you are excepting the fact you are willing to be tried under there law and entering into a contract.

All this information is written down if you don't believe me; anyway keep reading it gets better.

When the judge who sits on the Bench, Bench being another name for the bank, he will ask you for your name.

Now, what you must say is this," I would like to see the paper work or summons with my name on it" the judge will then have some one take over the summons to you to view.

Look for your name and you will find it in capital letters as always.

Now this is the clever bit, you then state to the judge that this is not me and that name does not represent me. Then look at the judge for he will know that you know the secret. Remember you are now under TMAL because this summons has money involved.

State that you as a living breathing person are identified only in upper and lower case letters.

The judge will then suspend the court, normally for two or three weeks.

You will still have to appear at court to play there game, but now the paper work has been changed, you will now see your name in upper and lower case letters.

And under TMAL your name comes under civil law so next to your name there will be AKA then your name again in capital letters, when you see this laugh to your self because again under TMAL they are breaking the law and some one other than you is going to prison because they can not put a AKA on a bill or summons and the judge knows that. normally the case will be closed and you walk away, but if the judge thinks you don't know every thing, just ask to see who has used your name with out your permission and has been using the AKA.....Watch and see the red faces appear. They will never go that far because that would expose the corruption.

What I have told you is hidden knowledge, they don't want you to know any of this, and they want to keep you ignorant and docile.

This information also means you don't have to pay your bills. It does mean you will have a record and will have appeared at court a few times but the more people know the better it gets.

Some people who are ordinary people living ordinary lives take a great deal of pleasure using this system to fight back and win every time.

Be it parking tickets to speeding fines, just remember whose name is on the paper, it’s not yours.

Okay, let's cut straight to the chase. Our 'countries' have been officially bankrupt since the 1930s and you are paying taxes, going to court, and applying for licences on behalf of a fictitious entity that does not exist, except in theory.

Oh yes, and the government is not a government, it is a private corporation. I don't remember hearing any of this on the television 'news'.

Some explanations:

1. The Bankruptcy

In the 1930s the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal, and many others, officially declared bankruptcy to the international banks, but didn't tell the people. According to researchers into these matters, this was agreed during the years of the Geneva Conventions in Switzerland between 1928 and 1932. It would appear, however, that the documents containing the details of the bankruptcy declarations have never been made public.


The Banking System



The cause of the financial collapse was the First World War followed by the Great Depression and the Illuminati banks refused to loan any more 'money' to governments (private corporations) to spend their way out of the slump. Of course, banks don't lend 'money' to anyone, only figures on a screen, and these 'countries' could have created their own currency. But the 'governments' are controlled by the same people that control the banks and so this doesn't happen. .


The bankers said they would only loan more 'money' if the governments/corporations declared official bankruptcy to the banks. This was agreed and from that time these 'countries' have been owned by the banks. When people ask, quite rightly, where all their tax money goes when services are so poor, the answer is that much of it goes to the banks to service the bankruptcy. .


The 'Free World'



In the United States Congressional Record of March 17th 1993 (Vol. 33, page H-1303). James Traficant Jr. of Ohio told the House: .


"Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the US Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner's report that will lead to our demise." .


It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent - H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress session June 5, 1933 Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only. .

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: 'The US Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States'.

Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less? We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest are a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington DC have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this un-payable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it. .


Traficant had the guts to speak the truth about the bankruptcy scam and much more. .


James Traficant was later jailed for alleged bribery and corruption because he was getting too close to the truth on many issues affecting the Illuminati agenda. He was also a maverick who was prepared to say what he thought. Here is a letter he sent from prison. .

. .


2. 'Governments' Are Private Corporations



I will focus on the example of the United States, but pretty much the same situation exists in Britain and elsewhere. The United States corporation was created behind the screen of a 'Federal Government' when, after the manufactured 'victory' in the American War of 'Independence', the British colonies exchanged overt dictatorship from London with the far more effective covert dictatorship that has been in place ever since. In effect, the Virginia Company, the corporation headed by the British Crown that controlled the 'former' colonies, simply changed its name to the United States and other related pseudonyms. These include the US, USA, United States of America, Washington DC, District of Columbia, Federal Government and the 'Feds'. .


The District of Colombia, home of the United States Corporation that most of the world thinks is a government decided by the people. The United States Corporation is based in the District of Columbia (Columbia = Queen Semiramis, the goddess of Babylon) and the current president of the corporation is a man called George W. Bush. He is not the president of the people or the country as we are led to believe, that's just what they want us to think. Therefore, Bush launched a 'war on terrorism' on behalf of a private corporation to further the goals of that corporation. It had nothing to do with 'America' or 'Americans' because these are very different legal entities. It is the United States Corporation that owns the United States military and everything else that comes under the term 'federal'. .


The Federal Reserve - the private bank that funds the private corporation known as the United States 'Government'. This includes the Federal Reserve, the 'central bank' of the United States, which is, in reality, a private bank owned by controlling stockholders (and controllers of the US Corporation) that are not even American. 'The Fed' is the bank from which the United States Corporation borrows 'money'. The Federal Reserve was manipulated into existence in 1913 and dictates the United States interest rate that has a massive knock-on effect for the rest of the world. .



Greenspan...Illuminati Man



The long-time head of the Federal Reserve or 'Fed' until this year was Alan Greenspan, a member of Illuminati front organisations like the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. His predecessor was Paul W. Volker of...the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. The new Fed chairman, Ben Shalom Bernanke, is another agenda place man because, if he wasn't, he wouldn't be there. The United States Corporation is owned by families and forces in Europe and the Jesuit-controlled Vatican is very much a part of this covert ownership of, not only the United States, but major European ‘countries’ likes the United Kingdom also. .


The privately owned corporation known as the United States is the holding company, if you like, and the 50 states are its subsidiaries. This means that these states also declared bankruptcy, or had it declared for them by the holding company, the 'Federal Government', but the people never knew and still don't. .


You can get the detail about this elsewhere and I am only summarising the situation to give people an idea of how deep this conspiracy really goes. .



3. Straw 'People'



The 'real' you, on the level of the living, breathing, free sovereign 'you', operates under Common Law. This is defined as: 'The unwritten law developed primarily from judicial case decisions based on custom and precedent. It developed in England and constitutes the basis for the legal systems of most of the states in the 'United States'. .


The government/corporation system controls, not through Common Law, but Admiralty Law, which is known in the United States as the Uniform Commercial Code. This is the law of contracts and to entrap us they have to get us to contract with them, even though they don't tell us we are doing so. .


The sting has been set up so that when you register with the 'Federal Government' in any way by accepting a Social Security number, driver's licence, or any of the other official federal documents, you are, unknowingly, agreeing to become an asset-employee of the 'government' corporation. From that moment you become responsible for financing the corporation's state of bankruptcy. This is the same in the UK.

When you pay taxes or a court or parking fine and such like, you are servicing the bankruptcy by paying that money to 'government' agencies that are nothing more than debt-collecting agencies for the creditor banks. .


They enslave the people in their law of contracts by creating a fictional entity using our names written in all upper case. When we are born they use the birth certificate to form an account in trust and create the fictional upper case entity or 'straw man'. Black's Law 6th Edition defines a straw man as:

A front; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principle may direct respecting the property. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some other purpose otherwise not allowed.' .


Another definition is: "a man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety." .


The definition of surety is:


'One who has contracted himself to be answerable for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another ... One who undertakes to pay money or perform other acts in the event that his principal fails to do so; the surety is directly and immediately liable for the debt..' .


So this is the way the fraud is played. They create a fictitious 'straw man' trust at birth and the trust uses the newly born's name in all uppercase. If the free sovereign is called, say, john bloggs - all lower case - the trust is called JOHN BLOGGS. .


Look at the documents we receive from taxation offices, any government department, banks, courts, police and so on. Look at your passport. Invariably they will spell your name in all uppercase because these organisations are operating under commercial law and only have jurisdiction over commercial entities - i.e. the upper case trusts. They have no jurisdiction under Common Law over 'you', the living, breathing, free sovereign. .


Uppercase documents that contract us with the corporation (government) to stand surety for the 'straw man' trust. What they do is trick us into standing surety for the trust and becoming liable for its commercial operations and debts. This is done by us signing their documents, applying for licences and in countless other ways. .


I have asked lawyers, court clerks and police officers why they always use our names in uppercase. They had no idea why. The overwhelming majority of those working for the system are ignorant of what they are administering and enforcing. That's how the Illuminati work throughout what we call 'society'. .


4. The Gold Fringe Fraud



The US court system operates under corporate law or the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) - to administer the bankruptcy and fleece the sheep to pay back the ongoing debt. The UCC is also known as British Admiralty or Maritime (military) Law and this is why the American flag always has a gold fringe when displayed in the courts of the United States. You will find the same in government buildings and federally-funded schools. .


Under the Admiralty Law of Flags, the flag displayed gives notice of the law under which the 'ship' (in this case the court or any other building) is regulated. Anyone entering that 'ship' (court) accepts by doing so that they are submitting to the law indicated by that flag. The gold fringe is a legal symbol indicating that the court is sitting under British Maritime Law and the Uniform Commercial Code - military and merchant law not common or constitutional law. Judges refuse to replace the flag with one without a fringe when asked by defendants who know the score because that changes the law under which the court is sitting. .


US courts sit under the gold-fringed jurisdiction of Admiralty - military - law. If you appear in a court with a gold-fringed flag your constitutional rights are suspended and you are being tried under British Maritime (military/merchant) Law. The Uniform Commercial Code was approved by the American Bar Association, which is a franchise, a subordinate branch, of the British legal system and its hierarchy based in London's Temple district (named after the Illuminati Knights Templar secret society). .


George W. Bush launched a 'war on terrorism' on behalf of a private corporation to further the goals of that corporation. Note how US troops, as here in Iraq, wear the flag with the gold fringe on their uniforms, indicating that they are representing Admiralty Law - the law of corporate contracts. They are there to serve the US private corporation and not a government representing the people. Note also that the stars are on the opposite side of the flag - this is the reverse symbolism of Illuminati Satanism, as with the classic satanic symbol of the reversed pentagram. .


By the way, if you think it is strange that a court on dry land could be administered under Maritime Law, look at US Code, Title 18 B 7. It says that Admiralty Jurisdiction is applicable in the following locations: And the same in all countries. .


(1) The high seas.


(2) Any American ship. .


(3) Any lands reserved or acquired for the use of the United States, and under the exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction thereof, or any place purchased or otherwise acquired by the United States by consent of the legislature of the state. In other words, mainland America .


All this is founded on Roman law because the Illuminati have been playing this same game throughout the centuries wherever they have gone. The leading politicians know that this is how things are and so do the major government administrators, judges. Lawyers and insider 'journalists'. .


The power that controls America is based in Britain and Europe (very much including the Vatican, the relocated Church of Babylon because that is where the power is centred that owns the United States Corporation. A sailing ship and the US Supreme Court. They are one and the same under Admiralty - gold-fringed - law. .


Those who realise what is happening and ask the court for the name of the true creditor or recipients of the fines imposed by the 'legal system' are always refused this information by the judge. The true creditors in such cases, and the ultimate recipient of the fines, are the bankers to which the corporation 'country' is bankrupt. More and more people in the United States are refusing to register in any way with the Federal Government, as news and documentation of this bizarre situation continues to circulate. .


If the authorities can keep this fantastic deceit from the mass of the people all this time, you can appreciate why they were confident they could ensure that what really happened on September 11th stays comfortably under wraps. .


There are people and organisations set up to help people free themselves from this web of deceit. Some have had significant success, while others have got themselves into serious trouble by not knowing the system well enough. .


If you are going to take on the 'straw man' system you really need to know your stuff, or someone guiding you does, because every word has legal meaning and many words have meanings that are not apparent in their normal every day usage. Also, the location where you speak to people, whether you shake their hand, and other 'contractual acceptances', are traps to tie you up in 'straw man' law.








The problem here is, if you hire a lawyer who is pledged not to reveal the true nature and the cause, how will you ever find out the nature and the cause? YOU WON'T! If the true nature and the cause of the action against you are revealed, it will expose the real creditor from whom this action and cause came. In other words, they will have to name the TRUE creditor. The true creditor will have to state the nature and the cause. The true creditor will have to say "It's a bankruptcy proceeding." The true creditor will have to say, "I'm the creditor and he's the debtor."


That declaration would open the door for you to question "Who the hell are you? How did you get attached to my back and by what vehicle did I promise to become a debtor to you?" In this country, the courts on every level, from the justice of the peace level all the way up...... even into the International law arena, (called the World Court), are administrating the bankruptcy and are pledged not to reveal who the true creditors really are and how you personally became pledged as a party or participant to the corporate World debt. What would really kill these people off would be to compel the International Bankers to send a lawyer into the courtroom and present himself as the attorney for THE TRUE CREDITOR, THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS. THEN, HAVE THE ATTORNEY PUT INTO THE RECORD THE TRUE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE PROCEEDING AGAINST YOU ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY.


The International Bankers told these various countries that they were now in a state of bankruptcy. The countries had been taken over by the creditor/bankers. And there was no choice, but for all these participating countries to declare bankruptcy. If they didn't agree to declare bankruptcy, the bankers threatened to collapse the economies and thereby put the countries back into the depression like the one from which they were just emerging. The bankers made an offer they couldn't refuse. To review and elaborate: In 1930 there was a world wide depression.


The Bankers said, "Look. You can do it either of two ways. The easy way or the hard way." "You just accept the bankruptcy and we'll let you out of the depression. If you don't, you're on your own." So all the countries involved agreed, because they realized that the International bankers had them by the throat. The countries therefore agreed that over a period of several years that they would pass statutes and legislation for the implementation of the bankruptcy in favour of the international bankers.


Now, it would probably be correct to say that the key bankers were the Rothschild's and their agents by way of Rockefeller, by way of the Federal Reserve Bank. Who the bankers were is immaterial. The fact remains that there was an International bankruptcy, and an International conspiracy to cover it up. There was a banking creditor who made the offer; the countries accepted the offer in order to enable the representative countries to continue without revolution and to allow the politicians to remain comfortably in place. Under a delusion of solvency the countries were allowed to continue to operate as though they were solvent; while in fact, the representative countries were bankrupt.


What were the effect and the significance of Erie vs. Tompkins case decision of 1938? The significance is that since the Erie Decision, no cases are allowed to be cited that are prior to 1938. There can be no mixing of the old law with the new law. The lawyers, who are members of the American Bar Association, were and are currently under and controlled by the Lawyer's guild of Great Britain, created, formed, and implemented the new bankruptcy law. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the Lawyer's Guild of Great Britain.


Since the Erie vs. Tompkins case was decided, the practice of law in this country was never again to be the same. It has been reported, that every lawyer in existence, and every lawyer coming up has to take a "secret" oath to support bankruptcy. As Officers of the Court they have sworn to uphold the law as it exists, and as they have been taught. In so doing, not only do the lawyers promise to support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers and judges promise never to reveal who the true creditor/party is in the bankruptcy proceedings (if, indeed, many of them are even aware or know). In court, there is never identification and appearance of the true character and principle of the proceedings. If there is no appearance of the true party to the action, then there is no way the defendant is able to know the TRUE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE ACTION. You are never told the true NATURE AND CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is forbidden to tell you that information.


That's why; if you question the true nature and cause, the judge will tell you "It's not my job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney and I can't give you legal advice from the bench. I suggest you hire a lawyer."

In order for you to understand just how this fraud works, you need to know the history of its inception.


It goes like this: From 1928 -1932 there were five years of Geneva conventions. The nations of the world met in Geneva Switzerland for 5 continuous years in order to set up what would be the policy of all the participating countries. During the year of 1930 the U.S., Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal etc. all declared bankruptcy. If you try to look up the 1930 minutes, you will not find them because they don't publish this particular volume. If you try to find the 1930 volume which contains the minutes of what happened, you will probably not find it. This volume has been pulled out of circulation or is hidden in the library and is very hard to find. This volume contains the evidence of the bankruptcy.

The financial system currently adopted by all nations is often described as "debt based", since the process of going into debt is relied upon almost exclusively to create and supply money to their economies. By the action of lending to borrowers, commercial banks create credit and advance this to industry, consumers and governments. This "bank credit" circulates in the broader economy until such time as the loan is repaid. Such "bank credit" now forms 96% of the money stock in most industrial nations, with a mere 4% the notes and coins created by government, and free from a parallel debt.


Thus, almost the entire money stock is supported in circulation by vast debts in four main sectors....


Private debts e.g. mortgages, loans, overdrafts, credit-purchases


Industrial and commercial debts


Government "national" debts


International, including Third World debt


The supply of money is a direct product of borrowing, and debt maintains this money in circulation. Modern debt is, in aggregate, quite unrepayable. Furthermore, difficulty is experienced in the repayment of individual debts in all four sectors.

The Drive behind Globalisation, 1998, pp 3-4.


Money is created in each of these four areas....







If a bank makes a loan, nothing is lent, for the simple reason that there is nothing of substance to lend. The bank makes what it terms a loan against the amount of money deposited with it at that time. This is all done with the utmost ease. The bank has simply to agree that a person may take out a loan of, say, £5,000. The person taking out the loan can then spend £5,000 and hey presto! £5,000 of new number-money has been created. No one with a bank account is sent a letter telling them that the money in their account is temporarily unavailable, because it has been lent to someone else. None of the original accounts in the bank has been touched, reduced or affected. Nobody else's spending power has been reduced, but £5,000 of new spending power has been created; £5,000 of new number-money enters the economy at the stroke of a bank manager’s pen, but £5,000 of debt has also been created.


Thus, whoever takes out the loan will then make purchases and payments to other people, who will pay that new money into their bank accounts. Result: more bank deposits! As soon as the loan in the example above is spent, £5,000 will find its way into the bank account of a car dealer or DIY store; £5,000 of apparently new money. This is money which has supposedly been loaned but the banking system doesn't distinguish this fact. It simply registers a new deposit, and regards it as new money. Total deposits in the banking system have therefore increased by £5,000. This is the boomerang effect of a bank loan by which a loan rapidly creates an equivalent amount of new bank deposits in the banking system. This effect was neatly summarised in a statement by Graham Towers, former Governor of the Central Bank of Canada.... "Each and every time a bank makes a loan; new bank credit is created -- new deposits -- brand new money."


The new money will provide the banking system with the collateral for more lending. This is the bolstering effect of a bank loan. As the total money held by banks and building societies becomes swollen by loans returning as new deposits this provides them with the basis for further loans.


Perhaps the best description of this process of money creation was provided by H.D. Macleod: "When it is said that a great London joint stock bank has perhaps £50,000,000 of deposits, it is almost universally believed that it has £50,000,000 of actual money to lend out as it is erroneously called... It is a complete and utter delusion. These deposits are not deposits in cash at all; they are nothing but an enormous superstructure of credit."

The Grip of Death, Jon Carpenter Publishing, 1998, pp. 11-13.









A country's national debt is completely separate from, and additional to, the level of private and commercial debt directly associated with the money supply. The United Kingdom national debt in 1998 stands at approximately £380 billion. If the private and commercial debt of £780 billion and the national debt are added together, the total indebtedness associated with the UK financial system stands at some £1160 billion, which dwarfs the total money stock of £640 billion! How did this condition of overall negative equity come about? This excessive indebtedness -- which is a blatant misrepresentation of the real state of economic wealth enjoyed by the nation -- is a position shared by all the developed nations.


The national debt is actually composed of thousands of pieces of paper called stocks, bonds and treasury bills. These stocks and bills, known as gilt-edged securities, or gilts, are essentially elaborate forms of government IOU. These IOUs are issued because each year the government fails to collect enough in taxes to cover the costs of its public services and other spending -- and it borrows money to cover this shortfall. All government budgets overshoot by many billions of pounds, dollars or deutschmarks annually. This leads to what is called the borrowing requirement for that budget year. A country's national debt is therefore the total still outstanding on all past years' borrowing requirements; thus the UK national debt consists of £380 billion of these gilt edged IOUs, in the form of outstanding treasury bills and stocks.


The method of issuing these IOUs and administering the national debt is quite simple. In order to obtain money to cover its annual spending shortfall, an appropriate number of government stocks and bills are drawn up by the Treasury. These are then sold in fact they are auctioned off in the money markets to the highest bidder. This is done throughout the year to meet the shortage of revenue as it arises, and the announcements, in the form of government advertisements, can be seen regularly in the financial press. These stocks and bills are bought because they promise to repay a larger sum of money at some future date, and are sold at a price that promises a good return to whoever buys them. They are usually denominated in considerable sums of £1,000 or more per bond and are bought by insurance companies, pension funds, banks and trust funds... anywhere that money accumulates as savings. By selling these stocks, the government obtains the additional money it needs for the public sector, making up the annual shortfall in what it can gather by taxation.


As these government stocks mature and become due for payment, the government has to find the money promised on those stocks, and pay it to the financial institutions that bought them. But governments are unable to pay this money owing on their past stock issues. Indeed, each government is confronted by the current year's annual shortfall in taxation receipts. The whole reason for the government issuing stock in the first place was because it could not cover its expenditure through taxation, and this annual shortfall is constant. There is no way a government can pay the money it owes. How then can the government pay up on its maturing stock? It has underwritten promises it cannot keep. What happens is that the government obtains the money to meet the payments due on maturing national debt stocks by selling more government stock to the financial institutions -- promising even more money in the future. The government draws up enough new stock to cover the repayments due on the old stock, sells this, and uses the money to pay off the old stock. Of course, when this new stock matures it too has to be paid off from the sale of yet more stock. The government manages to pay off the national debt, and not pay it, at one and the same time...


There is pretence that this is not the true arrangement, since repayment of national debt stocks is actually accounted as coming from taxation, not from the sale of more bonds. But this repayment from taxation creates such a massive shortage in government revenues that can only be made up by the sale of more bonds so the net effect is that repayment is constantly deferred by the sale of further government bonds. This is what is referred to as interest on the national debt although it is not really interest in the conventional banking sense, but a constant rescheduling of a completely un-repayable debt. This deferral is not, however, the end of the story....


At the same time as deferring and re-mortgaging the existing level of national debt, the government has to sell yet more stock to cover the amount by which taxation falls below what is needed to support its public services. The national debt therefore escalates, increasing by the amount required to re-mortgage the past national debt, plus the shortfall in revenues to fund the public sector. In 1960, the UK national debt was £26 billion; by 1980 it had risen to £90 billion. The national debt in 1998 stands at nearly £380 billion, and is likely to reach a trillion pounds within the next 20-25 years. In America, the national debt in 1960 stood at $240 billion; by 1997 it had reached the level of $5,000 billion, or $5 trillion!


It should also be remembered that the money held by pension funds and insurance companies, or whoever buys the government stocks, is money that had to be borrowed into existence in the first place. In other words, by this process, governments borrow money which has already been borrowed into existence, and they thus create a second massive institutional debt in respect of money which already has a debt behind it! Adding the national debt to the total of private debt places a country and its people in a position of overall negative equity, owing far more on paper than the amount of money that exists in the economy.

The Grip of Death, pp. 96-98.


So, in summary: Governments draw up official treasury bonds, and these are auctioned on the money markets. The bonds are bought by both the banking and non-banking sectors. When the non-banking sector (pension and insurance funds etc) purchases the bonds, saved monies are recycled into the economy through government spending. When the banking sector buys government bonds, banks and lending institutions create credit: There is an increase in the money stock. This money is spent into the economy through government spending.

Creative Accountancy, 1998, p. 29.







The significant point about coins and notes money created by the government is that this money is created debt-free, and spent into the economy by the government. This is a vital consideration, and it is therefore important to appreciate precisely how this injection of debt-free money is managed. Coins and notes are minted and printed by the government at no cost, apart from that of materials. Of course, governments have no particular need of these coins and notes; banks are the institutions requiring a supply of cash. The government therefore sells the coins and notes that it creates to banks, which pay by cheque, and the government acquires the face value of those coins and notes in number-money. The sum of money which the government obtains, and which is debt-free so far as the government is concerned, is then added to whatever taxation revenue has been raised to fund the public sector. Thus, coins and notes are created by the government, and an amount equivalent to the face value of those coins and notes is spent into the economy as a direct, debt-free input.

The Grip of Death, p. 14.





The financial position of even the wealthiest nations is one of acute financial pressure, with massive private and national debt, and budgetary difficulty dominating the economy. How can the wealthy nations, from a position of such perpetual monetary shortage and insolvency, lend money to the developing nations? The answer is that they do not. The money advanced to Third World nations is not money loaned from the wealthy nations. These sums consist almost entirely of monies that have been created, via the commercial banking mechanism, specifically for the purpose of the loan concerned. In other words, the same debt-based, banking process used to supply money to national economies is also employed for the creation and supply of funds to debtor nations.

Thus, these monies are not owed by debtor countries to the developed nations, but to private, commercial banks.







Holding only a nominal reserve contributed by the wealthy members, the World Bank raises large quantities of money by drawing up bonds and selling these to commercial banks on the money markets of the world. Thus, the World Bank does not itself create the money it advances to Third World nations, but sells bonds to commercial banks which, in purchasing these bonds, create money for the purpose. The World Bank therefore functions along the lines of a country's national debt. Just as with the government bonds of a country's national debt, when a commercial bank makes a purchase of World Bank money-bonds, the commercial bank creates additional bank credit. In essence, the World Bank acts as broker for commercial banks, who are the actual money-creation agents and who hold World Bank bonds in lieu of monies they create in parallel with debts registered against Third World nations. Although these loans may be denominated in pounds, dollars or Francs, such loans advanced under the World Bank have no connection with respective national economies, and in no sense represent monies loaned by these nations, or debts owed to them by developing nations. The debts are owed to private, commercial banks (via the World Bank) in respect of money they have created through the purchase of debt bonds.




The IMF presents itself as a financial pool an international reserve of money, built up with contributions, known as quotas, from subscribing nations -- that is, most nations of the world. However, credit creation accompanies almost every aspect of IMF funding....


Twenty-five percent of each nation's IMF quota is paid in the form of gold, the remainder in the nations own currency. The 25% gold quota is the only component of IMF lending capacity that does not, in some way, constitute additional money created in parallel with debt.


The 75% of a nation's quota payable in national currency is invariably funded by the government concerned through the sale of bonds, thus adding to that nation's national debt. Therefore the IMF, whilst not itself creating credit, places monetary demands on member countries for quotas that can only be funded via each country's national deficit. This involves the sale of government bonds to commercial banks, leading to money creation by those banks. This source of revenue forms the main fund of IMF monies available to developing nations.


Since the monetary demands on the IMF are constantly increasing, due to rising demand for Third World loans, the quota demands by the IMF have reached the point where (so-called) creditor nations such as America and Britain are reluctant to undertake yet more bond issues and further national debt to supply these funds. So, in recent years the IMF has begun to circumvent the restrictions of its overall quota. By co-operating directly with commercial banks to organise more substantial loans than it can fund from its own quota resources, the IMF administers loan packages made up in part from its own quotas and in part from commercial sources. For example, of the $56 billion loan advanced under the IMF to South Korea in the wake of the Asian crisis, only $20 billion was contributed by the Fund; the remaining $36 billion was arranged by direct co-operation with international commercial banks, which created money for the purpose.


The total funds of the IMF were substantially increased and its function and status as a money-creation agency clarified when, in 1979, the IMF instituted Special Drawing Rights (SDRs). These SDRs were created, and intended to serve, as an additional international currency. Although these SDRs are credited to each nations account with the IMF, if a nation borrows these SDRs (defined in dollars) it must repay this amount, or pay interest on the loan. Whilst SDRs are described as amounts credited to a nation, no money or credit of any kind is put into nation’s accounts. SDRs are actually a credit-facility just like a bank overdraft if they are borrowed, they must be repaid. Thus, the IMF is now creating and issuing money in the form of a new international currency, created in parallel with debt, under a system essentially the same as that of a bank... the IMF reserve being the original pool of quota funds.


In summary, of the $2,200 billion currently outstanding as Third World or developing country debt, the vast majority represents money created by commercial banks in parallel with debt. In no sense do the loans advanced by the World Bank and IMF constitutes monies owed to the creditor nations of the World Bank and IMF. The World Bank co-operates directly with commercial banks in the creation and supply of money in parallel with debt. The IMF also negotiates directly with commercial banks to arrange combined IMF/commercial loan packages.


As for those sums loaned by the IMF from the total quotas supplied by member nations, these sums also do not constitute monies owed to 'creditor' nations. The monies subscribed as quotas were initially created by commercial banks through the agency of national debts. Therefore both the contributing nation and the borrowing Third World nation carry a burden of debt associated with these sums. Both quotas and loans are owed, ultimately, to commercial banks.

The Invalidity of Third World Debt,

And finally, as the Maritime law is world wide it really does not matter which court you are seen in, so here is an example of what to say and do if you are required to go to court, if you are British just alter a few words, it works the same.




Shocked Yet?



What soon became very apparent is how we have all been deceived into giving our rights away and believing that their (governments) laws, statutes, acts apply to us, when in fact they simply do not…unless we give consent. If we do not consent to their offer, then the contract doesn’t exist and therefore it does not apply to us. You will soon start to discover exactly what is going on here.


This actually feels very uplifting, spiritual and profound as you discover that the powers-that-be have created the fear society. Even the great avatars of the past and present have warned us of this huge deception, the deception that has kept us feeling more and more oppressed and anxious. Think of the frog in a pan of water, and how the frog stays in the water as the pan is heated up. The frog is unaware of the dangers of being boiled alive as the heat increases very slowly. Well this is what the powers-that-be have done here…slowly turned the heat up until we are now in serious trouble…but there is a glorious and simple answer that they have hidden from us quite deliberately.


When armed with the knowledge that their statues and acts etc can be simply declined, the realisation of the size of this fraud, deception & illusion is absolutely staggering. We gained vast amounts of knowledge and empowerment from all of the above, and then had a good look at again, and realised that what, John Harris, and a growing number of people have now done is, in my opinion, the most simple and effective way of informing the powers-that-be that we are no longer playing their manufactured, treasonous & fraudulent game.


And yes, it is as simple as that. The statutes, laws and acts that they have formed, without our express permission & consent, are their rules in their game. But they are not our rules so we have the right and power to NOT CONSENT to their game, and this is exactly what we have done very recently. And remember that the vast majority of police, lawyers and government agents, as well as the human beings of the UK and the world, do NOT know about this immense deception…because they have been taught exactly what the powers-that-be wanted them to be taught in their education system.


Also, keep in mind that because of the government’s actions, past and present, they are committing acts of treason and fraud many, many times and on a daily basis! For this reason alone, and when armed with this knowledge, they have zero power of jurisdiction over us...the great thing is that isn't the only reason. They cannot take away our rights, but they have been incredibly efficient at keeping our true rights, the rights they cannot change, hidden well away from us.


We urge you to share and talk about this with others. We promise it will sink in. It takes a little time to appreciate the simplicity of the bottom line here because we are so used to thinking inside their box. You will soon discover this phenomenal life changing information that will enable you to close their box and live within the laws of our land, our birthright laws and the laws they cannot change!



Common Law & Commercial Law

Police, Councils, Banks and Government agencies etc are actually committing fraud against us with every Statute, Act, Order and Notice they use...Fact! Find out why & arm yourself with the knowledge that gives you freedom!






Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS)



For purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us!


Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to ones own advantage."


Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows …

Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization) In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications.


Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John Doe) - The lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man's family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law, 144.


Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John DOE) - A lesser or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man loses his rights of citizenship, but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights.


Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) - The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.


Diminutio.  Lat. In civil law. Diminution; a taking away; loss or depravation.


Capite. - Lat. By the head.



As Black's Law Dictionary explains, the full capitalization of the letters of one's natural name, results in a diminishing or complete loss of legal or citizenship status, wherein one actually becomes a slave or an item of inventory. The method, by which the State causes a natural person to "volunteer" himself into slavery, is through forming legal joinder, implied or stated, with the entity or legal fiction (name all CAPS). Of course, most natural persons wouldn't willingly form such an unlawful but legally reductionist joinder, so trickery and obfuscation are used; and this starts when our birth certificates are created.


Due to the UK, Canada and the US being bankrupt countries, yes all these countries have been bankrupt for some time now; they all have currencies that are known as FIAT currency. In other words, all our money is worthless! There is no big Gold or Silver reserves to back it up…look on any UK banknote and you will see the words, I promise to pay the bearer. It is a promissory note…nothing more. Worthless basically!


So when we are registered at birth, the government produces a corporation, a straw-man, by placing our name in all capitals. But why I hear you ask? Well as we are a bankrupt country (just waiting to go into an economic fold – exactly what is about to happen in the US) the government needs collateral to invest and to receive loans on, so we, the people, become slaves in bondage to be used as collateral with lenders.


Do not make the mistake of thinking that still doesn’t apply! Do not make the mistake of taking advice from anyone who studies, or has studied orthodox law, as they especially will not know this…they were kept well away from this deliberately. Police do NOT know that we and they are slaves in bondage, solicitors & lawyers do NOT know that they and we are slaves in bondage, and most government agents do NOT know either.


But the great thing is we don’t have to be. It is as easy as being knowledgeable, aware and then just politely declining their offered contract!



Do you know what you are? Are you a 'person'? Are you sure?

So you think you are a 'person', eh? According to Black's Law dictionary, 'a human
being is not a person because he is a human being, but because rights and duties have been ascribed to him. Specifically, the person is the legal subject or substance of which rights and duties are attributes.
But not every human being is a person, as was the case in Old England when there were slaves'.
You see, you as a human being have certain inalienable human rights. Your person has
certain inalienable civil rights. Believe it or not, you are not the one paying taxes, your person is.
Its not you that votes, your person does. You don't get a ticket, your person does. The best way to
imagine it is to imagine a human being wearing a coat. The human being is a 'man' or 'human being' or to some a 'natural person'. (We no longer use the term natural person, as it is still a person and has been ignored by the courts as having any distinction with person.) The coat represents the 'legal person'. The two together is referred to as 'individual'. (Indivisible duo).
If you can understand that so far, you can understand the next as well. You have many
They all have the same name, but have different personalities or functions. See, a person
is not determined solely by the name, but by the rights and duties ascribed to that person. When you get a traffic ticket, it is almost as if they are creating a person right there solely to deal with that issue. Once dealt with, the person is no longer bound by it. Say you go to vote and on the way you get a ticket. Can the person who got the ticket vote? Can you show them the ticket and use that to secure your right to vote? No you cannot. The two entities, although having the same name, have different sets of rights and duties, and therefore are in fact different
persons or at least different facets of one.
Now ask yourself, where does it say that you have to have a 'person'? Are you obliged to
have one?
If you do have one, can you give it up? Why have they gone to such trouble to hide from
us the fact that they act upon our persons? The reason is simple; they need us to be ignorant for their deception to work. Without ignorance, all the deception in the world won't help them hold onto their power. The person exists not so they can have power over us, but so we can escape the power they claim if it gets too onerous. If all they can act upon is our person, and we can disassociate from that thing anytime we want, we can be in control. If we are never aware it is there, we are slaves. That which YOU will be is entirely up to you.





Remember, your signature is the most valuable possession.


YOU'RE Birth Certificate



It is a miracle of a time, and when you are all excited about having your baby, the government social worker that works at the hospital will approach you with some registration forms, telling you 'you have to register your baby'. She will hand you a form and on the cover it says in bold language, 'Every Parent must register' and 'After a baby is born every parent must register
the birth and legal name of their child'. Inside it says:
This brochure contains an IMPORTANT form which parents must complete for
every baby born in British Columbia. The Registration of Live Birth form is the official
Provincial record of the birth and the registration of the child's legal name. Everything you need to
complete the form is provided including detailed instructions and a pre-addressed envelope.'
(It is designed to make you believe you have an obligation to register and if you don't the
law will get involved and you will be in big trouble.)
Next paragraph reads:
By law, you must register the birth and legal name of your child within 30 days of
the birth. Naming a child and registering the birth are your important responsibilities because
registration is the only way of creating a permanent legal record of a person's birth. There is no fee to register a baby's birth so long as it is registered within 30 days. Simply fill in the registration form and mail it in the envelope provided, or bring it to any BC Vital Statistics Agency office. See back cover of this brochure for our office locations and telephone numbers.
It then states:
At the same time as you complete the mandatory Registration of Live Birth form, you have the option of ordering a birth certificate for your newborn.

Now let’s take a very close look at what they are actually saying.

This brochure contains an IMPORTANT form which parents must complete for
every baby born in the UK. – This tells us ONLY the parents can complete it. The government cannot do it on your behalf. They use the word 'must'. Notice they do not use the word 'obligated' or 'obliged'. Must is a very tricky legal word, and when you find out its true meaning in a later bubble is burst, you will see what I mean.
Here they use the word 'baby'. They are referring to the human being; blood, flesh and
bone vessel of the spirit.
The Registration of Live Birth form is the official Provincial record of the birth and
the registration of the child's legal name. - Here they tell you the form is the Provincial record. Not yours.
Theirs. They have
also now slipped in the word 'child' instead of 'baby'. The reason is, there is no doubt in
law what a baby is;
there is ambiguity when you start using words like 'child'. The 'child', legally is the
'person'. Notice how also they tell you that you will be creating a 'legal name'. Not a lawful name, but a legal one. There is a big difference between the two, and it is one bubble that will be burst in following chapters.
By law, you must register the birth and legal name of your child within 30 days of
the birth. Again the word 'must'. And why must you do it within 30 days? What exactly is the penalty for registering late? Notice also the use of the words 'child' and 'legal name'.
Naming a child and registering the birth are your important responsibilities because
registration is the only way of creating a permanent legal record of a person's birth. - Now the trap is almost shut.
'Responsibility' refers not to what one is obliged to do, but who is to blame after the fact.
Notice here also how they are using not the word 'baby' nor 'child' to describe your offspring, they are using the word
'person' and they may not be describing your offspring at all. They tell you straight out,
by using the word 'person', that you will be creating a permanent one.
There is no fee to register a baby's birth so long as it is registered within 30 days. –
Ah-Ha! Here is why you have to do it within 30 days! To avoid paying a filling fee! Wow so scary! That is why they can get away with using the word must when there are no actual obligations.
Next paragraph, we find this:
At the same time as you complete the mandatory Registration of Live Birth form, you have the option of ordering a birth certificate for your newborn. –They also use the term 'mandatory'.
Notice what it is referring to; it is referring to the noun not the verb. The action is not mandatory; the form is, if you choose to register. Now we also apparently have some sort of option about ordering a Birth Certificate. Ask yourself this, if you have an option now, what makes you think you didn't have one to begin with?
Do you think they have an obligation to tell you what all your options are?
Here is the biggest question of all:
If what they are selling is such a good thing, why do they use so
much obvious deception to get us to buy it?
So this is essentially what is happening. When you register your offspring, you are
creating a legal entity or person, you are associating that person with your offspring and then you are abandoning that entity to the government, who appears to be seizing it under the laws of maritime commerce.
This 'person' is in fact chattel property and can and is used for collateral on loans. Your registered baby is in fact a form of pledge and is worth a lot of money. Also, if they ever come for your baby acting under some legislation, it is that chattel property they are acting upon, not your offspring. But because it was all done apparently lawfully and legally, and you maintain the association between that entity and your baby, they have the right to affect your offspring.
The Birth Certificate is not just evidence of the birth; it is evidence that you have
abandoned the king of documents: the Record of Live Birth. They will not accept a certified and notarized true copy of the original. Nope, they need the original itself.
Imagine creating a raincoat for your offspring, the record of creating that raincoat and
evidence of ownership you give to your neighbour. He then comes over and claims the right to
remove the coat, with your child still in it. That is exactly the legal mechanism they use to remove our offspring.

BIRTH. The act of being born or wholly brought into separate existence. Black's 1st
. See Note, and Note at birth record.
Note: A man or a woman is "born," straw men are "wholly brought into separate
existence." Each event qualifies as a "birth." The birth certificate documents a muddied mixture of the two events that allows the system to both claim that it is "your" birth certificate yet also claim to hold title to (not ownership of) the corporately colored straw man.

BIRTH CERTIFICATE. A formal document which certifies as to the date and place of
one's birth and a recitation of his or her parentage, as issued by an official in charge of such records. Furnishing of such is often required to prove one's age. Black's 6th
. See Note, birth, birth record, document
of title, field
warehouse receipt, and bond.
Note: A birth certificate is a negotiable instrument, a registered security, a stock
certificate evidencing, or representing, the preferred stock of the corporation and against which you
are the surety; it is a pedigree chattel document establishing the existence of your straw man, a
distinct artificial person with a fictitious name; it is a document of title to a straw man; it is a
warehouse receipt for your body; delivery receipt; industrial bond between you (flesh-and-blood
man or woman) and the industrial society and corporate US & UK  (artificial person).
In Canada & UK, the original birth certificate is generally created at the PROVINCIAL level
(in rare instances city level) via birth documents from the hospital (for which the hospital
receives £££ from the COUNTY for causing the registration of the birth) and passed to the Government Levels, and likely elsewhere. Per the definition of "birth" above, the document references both the newborn and the straw man. Certified copies of the birth certificate may be obtained at the Vital Statistics Office. Your birth certificate is one of the kinds of security instruments used by the Government to obtain loans from its creditor, under which it is bankrupt.
According to a researcher who worked on a research project for one of the world's largest
brokerage houses he discovered that in the year 1936 each birth certificate
was assigned a value of £630,000.00. The investigative journalist's report beginning on page xxiii
confirms that (new) birth certificates today carry a value of £1,000,000.00 and that upon notification of the receipt of a new birth certificate at the Ministry of Finance, it takes out a loan for $1-million and purchases a bond, then invests the funds in either the stock market or bond market. The collateral for the loan for the bond issued against the birth certificate is you; i.e. your body, labour, and property. A man in Santa Barbara, California who obtained his original birth certificate from the Department of Commerce some years ago via a Freedom of Information Act request reported the endorsements of 17 different foreign countries thereon. There may also be other types of birth documents used by the Government, or others, to obtain loans/credit.
BIRTH RECORD. Official statistical data concerning dates and places of persons'
birth, as well as parentage, kept by local government officials. Black's 1
. See Note, birth certificate.
Note: Under "birth certificate" the definition refers to "one's birth," and under "birth
record" the definition refers to "persons' birth." "One" means flesh-and-blood man or woman;
"person" means artificial or juristic person. See individual.
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei (1564 - 1642) those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commits atrocities.
Voltaire (1694 - 1778)
If you know not the name of a thing, all knowledge of that thing perishes.
The name is the note of a thing.





























Debt collection letter, send this and they will not bother you again.





Ref No:-



Dear Sir/Madam


I am requesting 3 documents from you.


  1. Validation of the debt( the actual accounting)
  2. Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a signed invoice)
  3. A copy of the contract binding both parties



I will be happy to pay any obligation I might lawfully owe as soon as I have received these three documents.


I understand that this is my right under the legislation contained within section 77 (1) and section 78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and am entitled to receive a copy of my credit agreement on request.

Your obligation also extends to providing me with a statement of account... I understand that a copy of my credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days from the date of this letter.

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act, creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

Also, since you are a Debt Collection Agency, I would also ask that you supply a signed true copy of the executed deed of assignment for the above referenced agreement. This is an obligation, whether you are the original creditor or not, under section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.


The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 makes it a Criminal Offence for any person to pursue a course of action "which they know, or ought to know, amounts to harassment of another person".

I would emphasise that I will contact Trading Standards if you do not supply me with my requests.


You’re sincerely



All right Reserved.
















This letter below for all Banks and utilities etc if they have added a charge onto any bill.


Test this on your British Telecom service as they penalise you if you do not pay by Direct Debit.





Dear Sir or Madam,


I am writing to protest about your penalty charge for customers who do not pay by direct debit.


I think this charge is unfair and does not reflect the true cost of processing my payment. It seems to me simply a way of increasing your revenue.


Provided I do so on time, it is my right to pay my bill however I choose. Why should I pay more just because I don't use your preferred payment method?


I urge you to reconsider this unreasonable charge. But if you insist on continuing with it, I would expect you to demonstrate that the charge is justified. You will be aware that the law says penalty charges must be fair.


I do not believe that this is the case with yours, but look forward to hearing your explanation.        


Yours faithfully,



All Right Reserved



























Credit Cards; No Need to already have!



Why don’t credit card balances have to be paid and how have we already paid?


Well there is one simple reason, yet for you to truly believe it and get your head around to the idea, you will have to do a little research yourself and then start looking at the financial system of this world very, very differently. But if you are already in controversy with banks, building societies or any credit card corporations, which is causing you great stress, then there is a quick and lasting fix that will deal with these deceivers. It works, and will give you plenty of time to then research how and why it works as it does. There will be pointers towards the areas of where to research, and then the rest of your journey is yours! The credit card corporation will obviously black-list you for your decision to not let them commit fraud and deception on you anymore, but that is the price!


Now their simple yet brilliantly executed trick (con) is in the name, ‘Credit’ card! You (well your signature or tick in a box on a pc screen and maybe a signature a few days later possibly, but not always) are a co-creator of credit with the credit card corporation. There was NEVER a debt incurred by anyone or anything. Don’t believe it? Then write to the CEO of the credit card corporation and ask for the validation of where a debt was incurred. You will not get one because a debt/loss doesn’t, and never did exist! That alone will get the fraudsters off your back as you now have proof that they have, and continue to commit fraud!


If you want to know why the corrupt banks operate like this, simply investigate a thing called Fractional Reserve Banking, and you will soon discover why the world is in the trouble it is right now!


Now remember that when you get a phone call from the crooked corporation/s, do not give them your name or D/O/B. Inform them (politely) that you would be more than happy to assist them, and they should contact you by letter using recorded post and put any claim they believe they have against you on paper and signed by the corporations Chief Executive Officer (CEO). By the way, this won’t happen, as the CEO knows they are already committing a crime against public policy and would be committing commercial suicide if they even thought about it for more than half a second!


If they keep troubling you by phone with various threats…oh they do make us laugh bless them; simply write to the CEO using Recorded Post with something very similar to the example below in black bold:



You will soon start waking up to who you really are. This is to assist you whilst you're waking up and becoming confident with the realisation that no man or woman has power over you, as you have no power of them! All are, and is, equal under whatever label you use to mean Source/Being/Divine...



















Full Address of their Head Office




Sent Recorded Post


NOTICE REGARDING ACCOUNT # (whatever the number is)


Dear Sir or Madam:


I would be happy to settle any financial obligation I might lawfully owe as soon as I have received the following documents from you.


1. Validation of the actual debt (the actual accounting).

2. Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice)

3. A copy of the contract signed by both parties and therefore binding both parties.


I hereby give you ten (10) days to reply to this notice with a notice sent using recorded post, and signed by the CEO under their full commercial liability and penalties of perjury, assuring and promising me that all of the replies and details given to the above requests are true and without deception, fraud or mischief.


Yours truly,


By: ____________________ (agent) _Date: ____________




In the world of commerce, get used to autographing and using (agent) in brackets after your autograph. This is because you are an agent for NAME in ALL CAPITALS, and the NAME is NOT you!


Now the banks cannot validate/prove the debt because they never sustained a loss and a debt never existed. They cannot verify any claim against you because you are not the NAME they are billing. They cannot produce a copy of the contract because one doesn’t exist; all that exists is an unenforceable unilateral contract, or what the banks refer to as ‘your contract with us’ and this is not a valid bilateral agreement, since the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract were not met on the credit card application. These are as follows:


1. Full disclosure (we are not told that we are creating the credit with our signature).

2. Equal consideration (they bring nothing to the table; hence they have nothing to lose).

3. Lawful terms and conditions (they are based upon fraud).

4. Signatures of the Parties/Meeting of the Minds (corporations cannot sign because they have no right, or            mind, to contract as they are legal fictions).


Oh, and always be polite and loving. Remember that the vast majority are not aware of this and so resist becoming righteous. Help others by allowing them, not restricting or trying to control them. You will soon see how much easier that is when you realise the corrupt law makers haven't ever had any true power over you.


This also helps you stay in honour, which you will start to discover is a massive thing in Admiralty/Commercial redemption.


Credit cards are based upon fraud and are win/win for the banks and lose/lose for everyone else. It is one of the slickest cons on the planet!


And an interesting spiritual slant:


So don’t worry and stay calm; after a little bit of watching and reading you will have some of the bigger dots joined up and be able to see straight through the massive deception, and your power will come flooding back…the very equal power that the Creator had always intended us to have, and the power His Son assured for us if all we would do is open our eyes, believe and accept. The Bible talks of sin and commerce talks of debt. Debt and sin are both one of the same, and all natural born human beings had their debts/sins prepaid when the Son of the Creator died on the cross to take care of all past, present and future sins/debts. And once you see through the deception you will also come to believe the concept, and once you believe and accept the concept and the symbolism of the crucifixion/for-give/prepay/bonds/insurance/debt/sin, you will soon see how symbolic the books in the Bible truly are! This is not about any specific religion; yet remember the Bible is the root of Law in the UK, USA, CANADA, NZ, AUSTRALIA and on and on, and the concepts of both Common Law and Admiralty/Merchant/Commercial Law, herald from the Bible.


For many, many years the UK, USA, CANADA and most other countries have been bankrupt, and operating in commerce using Law of Merchant Law/Admiralty Law. This is done by the use of insurance policies/bonds. Your NAME already has unlimited liability insurance in the shape of your Birth Certificate (Bond/insurance policy), and your National Insurance policy. You are the sole beneficiary of your NAME/Corporation’s Bond, yet you just didn’t know it. It can be reclaimed but first arm yourself with the knowledge, as a little information can be a dangerous thing!


Admiralty law is adversarial, which means the opposition doesn’t have to tell you what they are doing, yet it is unlawful to use fraud and mischief in contracts. Once you start to discover what has happened here, you will never see the world in the same way again!


Some incredible areas of research and information can be found below. Do not be put off if the researchers and presentations are based in the UNITED STATES (oh look, a corporation), CANADA (and another one), or anywhere else; the principles are almost identical everywhere where Common Law and Admiralty Law exist, and that means the UNITED KINGDOM (just another corporation).


Remember that the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, BANK OF CANADA is privately owned corporations that are based on the model formed in 1694 by THE BANK OF ENGLAND (The Rothschild family - Red-Shield). Oh and guess what the INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND is? How about THE WORLD BANK? 


You are free, you just don’t realise it yet!












Magna Carta & Article 61


Learn and become aware of Magna Carta…and feel the peaceful homecoming of the equality of all men and women. You are free and you always have been. Let the knowledge and wisdom come flooding back into you, and live with ever decreasing and diminishing fear!


Those committing treason in the UK are simply terrified at us, the people, discovering the truth about our true living soul, and God given human and sovereign rights that were sealed and secured by these nations’ founding fathers to protect us from the very persons attempting to destroy our freedom. It is these factual, unchangeable and undeniable rights that exist in the form of tangible and material documents, which are gradually giving us, the people, and our true, moral and spiritual power back! By the way, the number of us waking up to this is and will exponentially increase…as remember; it is no accident you are reading this!


Magna Carta 1215 & article 61 will release you from the bondage that is oppressing the masses right now, and further information can be found at For a direct link to a recent statement written by John Harris in regards to article 61 (which gives us all the consent and power to exercise our true right to enter lawful and peaceful rebellion against the traitors in false power, that are viciously and cunningly attempting the total control, oppression and spiritual rape of the people of Britain), click here.


"The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."


Courts, we hate them, what if they were nothing to be afraid of?? What then??

Courts, we all hate them, but do you know what they are? If I told you it was no more than a corporate business that exists solely for profit nothing more, using a friend’s analogy “MR. A” they are nothing more than a Mc Donald’s!! You want fries with that speeding fine sir?


You look at any court when you are about to enter it, above the door you will see for example “BROMLEY MAGISTRATES COURT” the name is in capitals for a start so that makes it “Corporate” a profit making organization, you will find it on “Dunn and Bradstreet” the “Bromley” part is who its run for the benefit of.


So being a corporate venue, everything relies on contracts, nothing works without contracts!

You have to agree to contract with them though, oh that’s easy you might think, as they have to ask and you can just decline right?


Well that would be correct if you knew of the contracts, well it doesn’t take much to start learning, the one door opener, is a “Standing in Commerce” seminar other way is just simply research.


When you enter the court, an usher asks for your name, that very first sentence is an offer to contract...


The simple fact is, a Master asks the questions and a Slave answers them! (Forgive the borrowed analogy “Mr. A”)

When you are asked for your name, tell them e.g. I am called John (not my name is John) and then tell them you are here regarding that matter.


They don’t like this stance and will try bluffing you into accepting giving up your Jurisdiction to them, they might try the old you can’t go in if you don’t give me your name DONT DO IT, you tell them you have a name you identify yourself as the “STRAWMAN” or “DEBTOR” then they have you right where they want you.


When they bluff, you can’t go in unless you tell me your name, simply answer that with “Tell the judge that I am called “*****” and I am here about that matter!


Now you have begun down a road that only the prepared will win (and practice makes perfect)

Seeing what answers have been given, the judge or should I say “Fries Server” will probably want you in his private chambers, this is the first baptism of fire, as when you approach his doorway you must wait, DO NOT cross the rooms threshold no matter what he says, he will probably state something “come in” you must then establish your terms YOU ARE IN CHARGE, YOU ARE THE ONLY REAL THING IN THAT BUILDING!! You state I will enter your room but with ALL of my rights intact, that ok with you? Well he’s not going to say no is he!

He will try allsorts, like sit down, pointing to the couch; you must state I will stand here with all of my rights intact if that’s all right with you?

Remember the court room is if you like a “Tennis Court Room” the ball is the question and the prize is jurisdiction, he serves a question to you, you answer with a question the ball goes back and forth back and forth, asking only open questions, as soon as a closed question is asked, that must be answered, bingo!! “15 love” whoever answered is starting to give away their jurisdiction, don’t be alarmed by a single loss or so, you can recover, just make your recovery convincing enough to get that ball bouncing again.


There are many ways you can learn these tricks of the admiralty system, the seminar being live is probably the best, soon we are going to start a list of small role playing groups that’s sole aim will be to improve and polish your courtroom performance.

There is something that you have to learn, when you decide to take up on the “Standing In Commerce” path, sooner or later you will have to end up in court, you think these elite companies want to take your Ban’s or Fad’s as payment NO they want your debt notes (fiat currency) if we keep needing fiat currency then the bankers keep needing to lend it, if the country keeps borrowing it the cycle of slavery will never end!! But by using Ban’s and Fad’s you will be expanding the credit supply according to public policy and will in fact actually be helping go against the fraudulent banksters.


Ok Judges, whether you know it or not there are two main types of judges.


"So you shall come to the Levitical priest or the judge, who is in office in those days, and you shall inquire of them and they will declare to you the verdict in the case”

To cut a long story short, and to give a simplified version, Levitical judges were priests whom used to take payment for settling disputes “see above quote” the thing is they used their “discretion” which in those days might have worked but for today’s corrupt and filthy corporations it just doesn’t work for the people especially as he has no oath, so basically he will get the money from wherever he thinks he can!!


The other type of judge is a “Melchisedec” this type of judge has an oath of office which makes him a little better to have, and you will find that judges can be either types or only one.


A judge that is operating under Levitical authority is nothing more than a “filthy fry serving corporate lackey” he is just an employee of a profit making company FULL STOP! This man is worthless!! Obviously he will like to stay a Levitical judge because he gets to use discretion, what that really means is, the only person who isn’t a member of the law society in that room is you so “TAG YOUR IT!” you can pay lowly public person!


So, you need to isolate the Levitical side of the judge, this is done by holding him on his oath of office, once that has been done he CANNOT practice law from the bench, he is nothing more than a referee!!

So you say “Sir, do you have an oath of office?” sometimes they wriggle (if they do wet yourself as you watch) well errrrr I might have written something on a piece of paper errr... don’t be discouraged, simply move on to the next question, “is that oath in this courtroom today?” If the judge says no the he is acting in the Levitical capacity and you straight away and with authority state! “ For and on the record, the court takes judicial notice of judge ****** oath of office!” look at him and make sure he takes note, they are slippery and would love not to, as they also don’t get paid in the Melchisedec capacity (laugh allot) ask them.... “Have you done that sir? Have you noted your oath is to entered into the record?” now he cannot attack you, now you have only the plaintiff to deal with, now it’s time to start in direct, and if the judge does more than just referee, you shout “judge you’re on your oath?”


This is just a small part of the tom foolery to be had in the court, training will make you surer about your stance, and it will show you your true freedom.


Other considerations in court are much more complex, you need to do a seminar and start to train.

The foundation of all of your activity is “Your Bond” the judge has a bond! What do you think his Bar number is? The barrister will have his bond! So when you enter court without one, you are actually “already in contempt”


You need your bond, you need to have the power it grants you in the admiralty environment and it is far more powerful than any corporate bond, you will find this out when you go to a seminar and get your training started.

I simply cannot give you all the answers on an article, if I give you too much information you may use it in the wrong way and it could cost you dearly, that why you need training, I have done it.

Just a small taste to get you started!


























Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right, send this to your MP, & Governments bodies, this is used to claim back your freedom and become a freeman of the land.


Whereas it is my understanding that the United Kingdom is a common law jurisdiction, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that a statute is defined as a legislated rule of a society which has been given the force of law, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the only form of government recognised as lawful in the United Kingdom is a representative one, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that representation requires mutual consent, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution and/or Bill of Rights, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that said scope and applicability is limited to members and employees of government, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that those who have an NI number (National Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the UK government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the United Kingdom government, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s NI number, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that human beings in the United Kingdom have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,

Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,

Whereas I, John Doe am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,


All of this is essential. It lays down your understanding, it lays the foundation of what you are going to go into with the rest of the notice, and it paves the way for what you are going to Claim the Right of later in the notice.


Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,

Whereas I am not a child, and,

Whereas I am a peaceful human being, and,

Whereas I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exist any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,

This one is optional – Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my National Insurance Number, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and creates no obligation or dishonour if ignored, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statute and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,

Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,

Whereas permanent estoppels by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time.


Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, John Doe, a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly, specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations and restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter.


Furthermore I claim the right to lawfully:

1. Exercise my “common law right to travel”, unhindered, unencumbered at my discretion in my private conveyance of the day, to wit, my private, unregistered, unlicensed automobile.

2. Exercise my God given right to travel as stated in the Queen’s Bible.

3. Exercise my “common law right” to refuse to obtain by submission; any application for any government issued license, permit or seek permission to perform any fundamentally lawful action or, enter into any government contract under duress, threat and/or intimidation which would involve committing an act of fraud and/or theft, or any other crime, by way of deception by “I” and/or any involved government principal, employee or agent, (in compliance with my Common Law Rights, the Magna Carta etc).

4. Exercise my right to possess, cultivate or use medicinally any plant of the genus Cannabis.

5. Exercise my right to possess unregistered, unlicensed firearms and ammunition and to use the same for target practice at a range or hunting for food and further swear under oath never to open fire on another human being unless as a last resort to protect human life.


I claim that pursuant to any action by any government and/or any principal, member, employee, agent, servant, person thereof in Right of Great Britain, a province, or municipality:

“I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally and I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any contract or commercial agreement not revealed to myself, which are my rights pursuant to Common Law”.


Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me under common law being; any and all intellectual property, real estate, trade tools, private automobile(s) and contents, firearms and ammunition, potted plants; contents at the private posted residence known as “Your address - Street, Town, CITY, POST CODE” are held under claim of right.


Furthermore, I claim that, the Crowns claim of; “escheat to the Crown or the Duchy of Lancaster or the Duke of Cornwall or to a mesne lord for want of heirs”, as referred to in the Administration of Estates Act 1925, stands as a lawful claim and whereas the United Kingdom is an insolvency, an estate, where everything is owned by God and currently held in trust under the Crown until a competent heir(s) appears and lays a lawful claim of jurisdiction.


Furthermore, I claim that the intentional blurring of the lines with smoke and mirrors, deception, outright lies and too numerous to mention false claims as to the well settled division, between the Crown created legal entity known as the “PERSON” and the flesh and blood creation of the Creator known as a “man”, is nothing short of theft, fraud, breach of trust and forced slavery, a heinous criminal activity of the most odious form.


Furthermore, I claim that “all persons, acting as, governments, principals, employees, agents and justice system participants claiming, “retained legal counsel” have, by virtue of their own and/or their principals actions, claimed “total incompetence”, in handling any of their own affairs in law and have become an instant ward of the court, hence, they are imprisoned by their own actions in hand or lack thereof.


Furthermore, I claim that due to the self evident facts in truth at hand, that all persons, the Crown, governments, principals, employees, agents and justice system participants claiming limited liability or immunity are doing so under the pretence of being in fact deemed totally incompetent and under law made instant wards of the Crown and/or court and therefore, cannot claim good faith or colour of right over anyone who is thus blessed as being a competent heir.


Furthermore, I claim that, “Ignorance of the Law” is not a lawful or legal claim when used by the Crown, government principals, employees, agents and justice system participants at any and all levels to my harm or detriment, especially by those claiming limited liability.


Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities’ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.


Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.


Furthermore, I claim that the courts in the United Kingdom are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim that they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.


Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act.


Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is (GB £250.00) TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY POUNDS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed, searched or otherwise regulated and (GB £2500.00) TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED POUNDS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarised consent.


Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm my interests or me directly or by proxy in any way.


Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.


Furthermore, I claim that the law of agent and principal does apply and that service upon one is equal to service upon both.


Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on videotape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose I see fit.

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ten (10) days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.


Make absolutely sure that the Notary does not put, “the person presented to me”. Be very specific. Make sure it is “the man” presented, or “the woman” presented, or “the Freeman” presented, or “the man on the free soil” presented. But NEVER the “PERSON” presented!


Failure to register a dispute against claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land John Doe.


(Place of Claim of Right – City, Country etc, dated, your name as the claimant i.e. John Doe, signed and NOT in capitals, name and address of your Notary Public. Then get the whole thing Notarised!



Here’s some proof its true, this was a demand from the DVLA
















And here’s there response, see it works...












Here’s the template which can be used for other demands…such as parking tickets etc.





Name                                                               The reference number so you can quote as

&                                                                      Precedent is: 359 H789AGU

Address here.


Date: (Date Here)


Sent by Recorded Post


Notice of Understanding and Intent – Ref: (registration number of vehicle)




You have apparently made demands upon JOHN DOE.

I do not understand those apparent demands, so therefore cannot lawfully fulfil them.

I seek clarification of your document so that I may act according to the law and maintain my entire body of God given Natural Rights.

Failure to accept this offer to clarify and to do so completely and in good faith will be deemed by all parties to mean you and your principal or other parties abandon all demands upon JOHN DOE and all offers of contract with JOHN DOE. In accordance with the above request for understanding, please fully explain and clarify the following;


1.    Does the alleged offence that you are accusing JOHN DOE of come under criminal law or civil law?

2.    How did the document you sent to JOHN DOE come to be addressed to a corporation?

3.    Is the document you sent JOHN DOE, an entity created by capitalisation, an offer of contract?

4.    Under what specific statute and/or legislation does the alleged offence come under?

5.    What is the full and complete wording of the oath taken by you, or any parties you are acting on behalf of in this matter, in regards to protecting Her Majesty the Queen and her people?

6.   As article 45 of Magna Carta 1215, one of the founding documents of the British Constitution clearly states the following, “We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or other officials, only men that know the law of the realm and are minded to keep it well.” Are you able to assure and promise me that you are wholly aware and knowledgeable to the precise and total contents of all the British constitutional documents, law and legal documents of the British realm?


Please be aware that my administration charges for responding to any further accusations of alleged offences are £500 per hour for my time and labour, and £100 per letter sent to you or the DVLA from me in response to any allegations made towards JOHN DOE.


Please also be aware that I have served Her Majesty the Queen two Affidavits informing her that I have now rejected and denied all forms of allegiance to Her Majesty the Queen and those traitors who claim to serve her, which is my common law right under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215. If you wish to have copies of these Affidavits, please feel free to request them, yet be aware these will be charged to you at £100 per Affidavit copy. (If you haven’t sent Affidavits that can be found on , don’t worry as it isn’t vital. The DVLA are breaking the law here, not you!)


In the event of you deciding that this matter must be prosecuted, then I require you to state the area of Common Law under which any such prosecution will be pursued.


At present, I do not consent to contract with you. BY :________________________( agent) Date: 


Remember the capitalised name (i.e. JOHN DOE) is not you, it is a fictitious entity/corporation set up by the government, so you autograph it as the agent of the entity. An autograph is a full name written, not just the first initial and then the surname. You’re the agent, not the surety & therefore non accountable!











































And finally here’s a two letters to send to the Queen….



A freeman in Lawful Rebellion under article 61 of the Magna Carta is stopped by the police...

A recent encounter of a freeman’s' contact with the police:
I was pulled over tonight by the police and I had my 14 month Daughter on board also. I got out and said hello and all the usual things. I switched my Dictaphone on in front of him so that he clearly knew what I was doing. At this point, the officer was polite and asked if I had a license, and I said I do not have a license. He LOOKED AT ME with wide opened eyes in shock. He said I hope you do have a license as he smiled, well I had spoke in a manner like it was the normal thing to here or say. I said well yes my person has a license but I don't. He said "you’re losing me", as he smiled.

I was then immediately spoken to by a school leaver style officer, she was fun. So she asked for my NAME and I said "the name of the person is".....and she put her voice and said "I don't want the persons name I want your name". This was cracking me up inside with laughter for now she was asking for my lawful name and all there statute's only applies ONLY to the LEGAL ENTITY the PERSON (all caps) so now she was asking for my lawful name as she had asked for, and as again, my lawful name has no joinder with there statute law. (This was why I was laughing inside) She said look mate you will be nicked if you don't give me your name. Well I said to her "the name your are requiring is ########### ######"
And she started to calm down.

(REMEMBER I was threatened of my freedom if I did not comply, and you CANNOT force someone into a contract if they do not lawfully consent to it nor can you enforce a contract onto a PERSON if you the agent do not consent to it.)

So they said they said from the way I am acting and behaving it appeared to them as if I was concealing something and that my eyes were glazed. Well I did have a joint hours and hours before I went out. (Must have been good stuff.)

The male officer then looked at me and said he was going to do this under the new laws SOCPA or something like that.

I said I still consent to neither search of me nor my car. He put his gloves on as he was having none of it. Immediately I pulled out a joint from my inside pocket. I said "this was given to me earlier it is a ".Marijuana joint." He said well im searching you for we have found drugs on you. I said "NO YOU HAVE NOT" found drugs on me for I supplemented you (as a gift) as you accepted it from me as I said I have nothing to hide. there's no found about it. Well they did search me and my car and I made sure they repeated their numbers for the Dictaphone. Now the only reason they pulled me over was because my car was 3 months out of TAX, (well that is my conclusion?) As he was searching me I said I did not consent to being searched and that if he looked on Dunn and Brad Street the courts of justices are advertised as corporations and therefore this means contracts and they need consent.

So I said to the officer that I had a signed witnessed document in my file on the back seat by a Notarized Solicitor in Poole stating under article 61 I had in fact entered LAWFUL REBELLION! And that I am lawfully and legally  bound by there instructions nor to comply with their orders and that if they also choose to not to respect this they as officers of the courts would be in-complicit with this act also so I must make you fully aware of this.

At this point another POLICE car pulled up with a lone male officer. The male officer briefed him on what had taken place. At this point my Dictaphone cut off for I had used all the digital memory. The officer would not allow me to retrieve my Dictaphone from the roof of the car to pre-record over another message. He was so relieved at the fact this went of. WELL why would he not want me to record proceedings? I'M DOING HIM A HUGE FAVOUR! He then stopped me again and said "NO it's not necessary, I’ve been fair with you and polite so I assure you this won’t be needed and once we are happy we will let you be on your way. So I smiled and said "yes you have been polite and so forth ok let’s move on"...

Well the school girl officer said is this registered to you? I said “it is registered to the PERSON". She never squabbled.

Well they then walked around waiting for a record check you know for the usual stuff like anything outstanding fines. Whilst this was going on the newly on the seen officer said to me "are you the bloke that is deeply into the MASONS? I said that depends on what you mean"....He said "well hold a deep knowledge of the MASONS? I said “something like that" as he said “I thought I knew your name from somewhere.

It came through as I over heard the officers radio as he had is had it switch to radio but the volume was really low. They then huddled together and muttered for an a few moments. By this time my Daughter was screaming with upset for I was not near the car in her view. Then one of the other male officers came over to me and said as I" imagine you wouldn't want to do all the paper work now and  will want to get on what with your daughter screaming and the cold"

I said “of course". He then said he will give me a statement (search form) of the events of the search which will be at the police station for 12 months. At this point I said “12 months I thought it was 14 days standard procedure? He said "NO listen to me" I will fill out what's happened tonight and the events and it will stay with the police station for 12 months ok. I said "erh ok...... meaning and....? Please continue officer.

And he said ok again to me as I asked do you wish me to sign anything. He said "NO" you’re free to go!!!!!

As I left I explain very quickly about the truth of registering a child or a vehicle and that this was why the government has to pay child support for it is there property when point to fact EVERY CHILD ought to be entitled to the benefit without having to sign anything. And the male officer was agreeing to what I had said regarding the truth of registering. I also said that this all can be found at And they looked at me and said "ok thanks in a calm voice as I went back to my untaxed car and made my Traveling journey.
PEOPLE do you realize if there is no signature then then is no contract. And NO CONTRACT = NO CASE Fact!!!!
All I can say is my approach was calm, with no malice and peaceful. I can only think that it must have been a case of where the officer had taken Notice of my previous statement of LAWFUL REBELLION

And that I had not consented at any time nor did I have any ID and I did tell the officers I was recording and gaining evidence. To which most of it was recorded.

And maybe as they were chatting they came to the conclusion that I was Knowledgeable????

And that maybe one of the officers knew a thing or two about the truth of the deception "PERSON" and gave me the benefit of the doubt???

Or they just could not be doing with the paper work for they knew I was not going to make it easy for them as in the past I had sent NOTICE'S to the police in the past and never heard from them again regarding cutting them up and having no mot and below the limit tyres along with no invalid insurance for the mot was expired which was to the case. Yes mot had expired but it states in the EVENT of an accident should a party have no mot......... See! I had not had an accident! So I was insured.

So again I only imagine they must have record of this as a possibility to why they left it at that and let it go?

I will be sending the recording of the incident up until it cut off to upload once I work out how to retrieve the messages to my computer. As for the record for those who leave reply messages-
(A) I have always smoked cannabis from time to time
(B) I have an excellent driving record overall.
(C) Had you seen Clarkson and a guy did two driving test one without cannabis the other with. And he had full points with a joint and a few points deducted when he had not had a joint!!!! Fact! But it had been Hours since I had traveled... (I wouldn't do that)
(D) If you study and research on how banks operate and government operate you will see what we are told as to where our money really goes and how much is really generated then you will learn the BIG SCAM!!! and see that I by not paying am doing no financial harm for I am decreasing the Debt and DVLA always create the liability but never send you the remedy such as a RET.
(REMITTANCE) commerce stuff.
(E) I LOVE MY SOIL and will defend it well against those whom wish to create conflict against my fellow Englishmen and Women and against Our fellow human cousins or brothers and sisters if you will by nature Blacks, Asians, religion and so forth that share our land in peace with us and CONTRIBUTE to our economy. (As many whites do not also)
And CANNOT allow mass Genocide and fund fake wars and support TRAITORS to this by feeding the machine MONEY that LEGALLY I am empowered from doing so (article 61) and have ethics unlike those in office.

That's all for now. And spread the word!!!!!!!!  (























Affidavit of [Your Name Here]

In Pursuit of Justice and Right, And in Full Exercise Of My Undoubted & Lawful Duty to My Sovereign Lady, Elizabeth the Queen -


I, [Your Name Here], now resident at [Your Address Here].




IT BEING APPARENT TO ME and to a multitude of others that divers evil persons have falsely and unlawfully induced Our Sovereign Lady to believe that they alone are the true representatives of the people placed in Her Majesty’s Care by Almighty God - 


AND IT BEING APPARENT TO ME and to a multitude of others that these same evil persons have unlawfully and falsely induced Our Sovereign Lady to give an unlawful effect to legislation that has violated and continues to violate the Common Law: Which legislation further serves to undermine; deny and destroy the Absolute Supremacy of Her Majesty’s Imperial Crown, all to the prejudice of Her Majesty’s People, and in absolute contravention of the right of the people to live in accordance with their own laws and customs (as evidenced by the terms of the Oath that was undertaken by Our Sovereign Lady before Almighty God at the time of her  Coronation)  -  


AND IT BEING FURTHER APPARENT TO ME and to a multitude of others that the entirely lawful authority of Our Sovereign Lady the Queen to Uphold & Defend Her People is now so reduced &/or destroyed by the many processes of Treason that have been and are now being employed against Her Majesty’s Authority from within the ranks of those evil persons who have been and are now entrusted with authority to manage the affairs of Her Majesty’s Parliament & Government of the United Kingdom –


That my Security and Safety under the Rule of those Laws that are my inalienable birthright are now threatened to
my personal detriment and danger and to the detriment and danger of my family; my people and my country in
their entirety 


AND IT BEING FINALLY APPARENT TO ME that I can achieve no redress to those many grievances that I now have and which result entirely from the Unlawful Conduct of those Evil Persons who now surround the Person and Throne of my Lawful Sovereign, except by means of the lawful process that I now intend –


I NOW PLACE ON THE RECORD of All Persons who now claim to assert a lawful authority over me in the name of Elizabeth the Queen that unless there is correction to the many processes of misgovernment & abuse that have been and are now being imposed on me; with such process of correction being commenced; undertaken; evidenced and given a first and lasting effect within a period of 40 days from this present date –


SUCH PROCESS OF CORRECTION being fully evidenced by Her Majesty’s dismissal of the Assembly of Traitors that is now falsely describing itself as the Representation of the People within the House of Commons AND WITH SUCH DISMISSAL providing the entirety of the People themselves with full opportunity to speak and to act on their own behalf in the election of representatives that are truly loyal to the purposes of Her Majesty’s Throne & People  -


THEN I WILL WITHDRAW And withhold all allegiance & obedience to the Person and Crown of Our Sovereign Lady, Elizabeth the Queen, and those who falsely claim to speak &/or to act in Her Name, and by such action, I will remove myself entirely from the authority of those Evil Persons who now seek to abuse & misuse me in the name of Elizabeth, the Queen and in absolute violation of the Common Law of the People to which I belong –


AND I GIVE NOTICE that I will return to my full allegiance to the Person; Estate & Imperial Crown of Elizabeth the Queen only when Her Majesty the Queen is released from the bondage that now prevents her from the free exercise of her lawful authority and duty to Uphold the Common Law that is my birthright and to ensure for all time to come that the government of my country is conducted in full accordance with the laws and customs of my people.


May God in His Mercy, Defend the Right & May God Save the Queen from those who now hold her in an Unlawful Captivity.


__________________________ [Your Name Here].


Before me, An Officer of the Court, or Solicitor


Print Name____________________Date_________

(Signed & Sealed)

Sworn at:_________________________________

Send this second one 40 days later by recorded post.





Second Affidavit of [Your Name Here]


WHEREAS It Is Now Made Plain To Me that Elizabeth the Queen has been entirely deposed from her Freedoms; Crown; Authority & Dignity, by the devious machinations of traitors and by all of those evil persons who have formerly or do now support the enterprises of treason, contrary to the Laws of God and contrary to the known laws and customs of the kingdom and people of England -

AND WHEREAS the said Elizabeth the Queen is now entirely deposed from her lawful power and authority to Govern the Nations & Peoples of the United Kingdom, with Northern Ireland –

AND WHEREAS the said Elizabeth the Queen has been and is now unlawfully restrained from providing a full and adequate response to the content and requirements of an affidavit that I have served upon her in a lawful manner –

NOW I, [Your Name Here], now resident at [Your Address Here].



FOR THE REASONS GIVEN within the content of the preamble to this present document, I Must and Do Now Remove Myself from All and Any Allegiance to Elizabeth the Queen, to the purpose of removing myself at law from the authority of all of those Hateful & Evil Persons who have taken it upon themselves to hold Elizabeth the Queen a prisoner in her own land – and or who have taken it upon themselves to misgovern the United Kingdom in the Queen’s Name, by the process of laying an unlawful claim to the True Authority of Elizabeth the Queen; such claim to the Royal Authority being entirely contrary to the known and most ancient laws and customs of the realm and being most clearly an  expression of Treason.

I DECLARE that as from and including this present date, and for all such time as may now be required to restore Elizabeth the Queen to Her Freedom and to The Lawful Dignity & Authority of her Crown, I DENY AND WITHHOLD ALL ALLEGIANCE AND OBEDIENCE TO ELIZABETH THE QUEEN, to the precise purpose of providing some defence to Her Majesty’s Person; Royal Estate and Freedoms, by the process of denying all and any lawful recognition to those Evil Persons who now hold Her Majesty captive to their own Treasons; Evil Designs and Unlawful Purposes, contrary to law -

AND TO THE FURTHER PURPOSE that my own Security and Safety under the Rule of those Laws that are my inalienable birthright may be safeguarded against the threats to Freedom & Liberty now being posed by Divers Evil Persons, contrary to law.

I NOW DECLARE to All Persons claiming a legal authority to exercise the power of government, in the name of Elizabeth the Queen that their authority to govern me in any way whatsoever is both denied and ended.

I FURTHER DECLARE to all such persons that my personal freedom comes directly to me from God Himself, and that the walls and doors of all and any prisons now under the control of Traitors to the Crown & People of the United Kingdom will crack wide and will open at the behest of God Himself, if they should seek to impose penalty upon me for my departure from their mischief’s. 

FINALLY, I give Full Notice & Assurance  that I will return to my allegiance and obedience to the Person; Estate & Imperial Crown of Elizabeth the Queen when Her Majesty is entirely released from the bondage that now prevents her from the free exercise of her lawful authority and duty to Govern Her Peoples in accordance with their own laws & customs; which authority requires Her to Defend Her Peoples; Her Kingdoms; Her Realms and Her Territories in full accordance with the terms of the Oath that was Sworn before Almighty God & The People on 2nd June, 1953.

THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND is my birthright and at any future time of returning to a condition of Full Allegiance and Obedience to the authority of Elizabeth the Queen, I will require and expect to receive The Queen’s Own Freely-Given Assurance that the government of my country will from that same time be conducted in full accordance with the laws and customs of my people; which laws and customs require and demand that the activities of all and any parliaments and governments of the United Kingdom be constrained to act within those provisions of the law that provide for the existence of such parliaments and governments. 

May God in His Mercy, Defend the Right & May God Save the Queen from those who now hold her in an Unlawful Captivity.


__________________________[Your Name Here].


Before me, An Officer of the Court, or Solicitor


Print Name____________________Date_________

(Signed & Sealed)




Parking Tickets


The best way to think about a parking ticket is to imagine yourself in a restaurant and the server informs you that you owe them money for your bill.  What do you do?  If you are familiar with them you may just pay, but you have the power and right to ask them to bring you a bill.  Although you are in a position where there is a debt, unless it is verified you do not have to pay. 

Imagine you are in the restaurant, the server tells you that you owe money, you pay without seeing a bill and some smarty pants decides  that you seem to pay people money merely because they tell you to do so.  He therefore tells you owe him money too.  Suddenly everyone in the entire place starts telling you that you owe them money.  Would you pay every one?  Of course not.  

A parking ticket is not a bill it is a Notice.  It is not the server presenting a bill; it is the server telling you there is a bill.

Your obligation at this point is to ask for, receive and then if it is proper pay the bill.  However, if the server refuses to present you with a bill, can you be charged with refusal to pay?  No you may not.

Think now of a bank, and imagine they were merely told they owe $40.  Do you think they are just going to pay without verifying the obligation first?  They will conduct a standard administrative process involving simple steps.  The first is to see an actual signed bill.  Once you see that you need to verify that the bill presented is the result of a lawful binding two party contract, you then confirm that their obligations have been fulfilled and if so, you have an obligation to negotiate and pay the bill.

If however, they can't show you a bill, contract or evidence of fulfilment of their obligations, why would you pay them anything?

You have every right to administrate your own affairs and to see a bill before paying anything.  A bill will be signed and you have a right to refuse to pay it unless it is supported by a contract.








Violation Tickets


If you are reading this, chances are you have at one time or another received a Violation Ticket. Like many others, you might have considered it to be unfairly issued, yet to fight it would require you to take time off work and go dispute in court, often with nothing more then the hope that the officer who issued it would not show up. It is not like these tickets are honestly issued. The authority to issue them is covered in so much deception it really feels more like we are being fleeced. The Violation Tickets and Appearance Notices have been deconstructed and the deception inherent within them is about to be revealed to you. With this information, you can successfully deal with any Violation Ticket or Notice honourably and without worry of having to go to court. The way to deal with them is to first understand what some of the words on them actually mean. Then you must realize that you have options not mentioned on the Tickets themselves. Once you have a basic understanding of what it is you are actually dealing with, you can better defend yourself against them.


First you will learn what some of the more deceptive words mean, and then we will take a very close look at one of the Tickets and one of the Appearance Notices and examine not only what they do say, but more importantly what they do not say. Then you will be shown sample documents you can use as a template to deal with your own Tickets and Notices. Although this information is specific to Crown controlled countries, it relies on the Bills of Exchange and therefore should be suitable across the country.

Now let us suppose you are in a restaurant, the waiter tells you that you must now pay.  You of course are an honourable sort and immediately agree to pay, as soon as he brings you a bill.  He brings you a bill and when you try to take possession of it, he tells you that you have sign it, so he can take the bill to the large angry looking men in the corner who will then come over and beat you up for refusing to pay.  Does this make any sense?  If you didn't feel like getting beat up, and the waiter refused to present a bill would you owe anything? 


Now what is a bill of exchange?  The definition is as follows: 16. (1) A bill of exchange is an unconditional order in writing, addressed by one person to another, signed by the person giving it, requiring the person to whom it is addressed to pay, on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in money to or to the order of a specified person or to bearer.


Now compare that to a violation ticket and tell me how it differs.  You will see it doesn't!  It matches the definition exactly, and when it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck and looks like a duck, guess what it is! 


You end up in court not for the action that led to the creation of a bill, but for the way you dishonour that bill when it is presented.  And the Law of course provides remedy.

































Children and teens against government debt